Skip to main content
Construction

[BRAND NAME] — GLOBAL

Confidential — Interior Design & Contracting ·

The challenge
The brand operated across 22 countries but appeared on Google as 22 disconnected businesses. Names, addresses, service descriptions and categories had been entered locally over time, so each market presented a slightly different version of the same company and Google had no reason to treat them as one trusted entity. For a high-ticket interior design firm, that inconsistency is expensive. Decision-makers search locally, compare the map pack and judge credibility on profile completeness and reviews before they ever open a website. Several markets had incomplete profiles, thin review counts and category settings that excluded the brand from the searches that actually generate project enquiries. Managing this at scale added a second problem: no central governance, no naming convention and no safe process for making bulk changes across 22 verified listings without triggering suspensions.
Results

What changed, and over what period

22/22
Profiles verified, standardised and live
+94%
Profile views across all markets
+112%
Discovery searches found by new buyers
+68%
Website clicks from Google Business Profile
+57%
Calls and direction requests
4.2×
Review volume across the portfolio
Discovery
searches outgrew direct searches by a wide margin - the clearest signal that the brand started appearing for people who didn't already know its name.
Approach

What we actually did

  1. 01Built a single master data standard before touching a live profile -one business name format, one service taxonomy, one description architecture so 22 listings could be aligned without each market drifting again in three months.
  2. 02Ran a full audit of every profile: verification status, duplicate and unclaimed listings, category accuracy, service area definitions, hours and NAP consistency against each market's local web presence.
  3. 03Corrected category strategy per country. Interior design, fit-out and contracting sit under different primary categories depending on local search behaviour - profiles were mapped to what buyers in that country actually search not a copy-pasted global setting.
  4. 04Localised without fragmenting. Descriptions, services and hours were adapted to language, currency, and working-week norms - Gulf markets on Sunday-to-Thursday, European markets on local holidays - while brand identity stayed identical across all 22.
  5. 05Rebuilt the visual layer with project photography and completed-work galleries per market, giving each profile the visual proof a design buyer looks for before shortlisting.
  6. 06Staged all changes in controlled batches rather than bulk edits, protecting verified listings from suspension and keeping every market live throughout the migration.
  7. 07Set up review generation and response as an ongoing system per country, so trust signals build continuously instead of clustering in one or two markets.
  8. 08Established a single reporting view across all 22 locations, so market-level performance can be compared and effort pushed toward the countries showing enquiry momentum.
Construction

Recognise the problem?

We will start by working out whether your constraint is actually the same one.